Syed Jawad Ali Shah
In recent developments, Pakistan has unveiled what it claims are undeniable proofs of a broad conspiracy aimed at destabilizing the region. This isn’t merely about the arrest of one terrorist—it’s a sign of a wider, more dangerous pattern involving India, backed by the United States, working to sow instability in South Asia. With rising tensions between global powers, especially the U.S. and China, this series of events is seen by many as part of a calculated geopolitical maneuver to provoke conflict and maintain Western dominance in the region.
The Arrest in Jhelum:
On April 25, 2025, authorities in Pakistan apprehended a man named Abdul Majeed at a bus stand in Jhelum. The seizure included 2.5 kg of explosives, a drone of Indian origin, and a large amount of Pakistani currency. In a press briefing, the Director General of ISPR, Lieutenant General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry, revealed that Majeed had direct ties with India’s intelligence agency RAW and was in active communication with Indian Army officers.
Leaked conversations and voice messages presented during the briefing exposed active-duty Indian officers—Subedar Sukhwinder, Major Sandeep Verma, and Havaldar Amit—allegedly coordinating terror attacks on Pakistani soil. Majeed was reportedly paid to carry out a blast in Kotli, while the drone found at his residence contained a hidden stash of cash.
False Flag in Pahalgam:
India’s attempt to blame Pakistan for the Pahalgam attack was firmly rebuffed by the Pakistani military, citing a lack of evidence even a week after the incident. In a surprising twist, the head of India’s Northern Command, Lt. Gen. MVS Kumar, was reportedly dismissed after refusing to launch retaliatory action against Pakistan, suspecting the attack was an internal false flag operation. Sources suggest Kumar’s resistance clashed with the Modi government’s aggressive agenda.
Noshki Blast:
The press briefing further revealed the planning behind the deadly Noshki explosion in Balochistan. According to officials, the attack was orchestrated by RAW and executed by the outlawed Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA). This connection was confirmed during the interrogation of a captured terrorist, Fareed Baloch, who allegedly confessed that the BLA acted under RAW’s direction—solidifying Pakistan’s assertion that India was waging a proxy war.
Iran Under Fire:
Meanwhile, deadly explosions rocked Iran’s Port Abbas, where military shipments from China and Russia were reportedly stored. Iranian media sources pointed fingers at the U.S. and Israel, claiming sabotage aimed at disrupting the growing influence of the China-Russia-Iran bloc. These attacks resulted in over 50 deaths and more than 1,000 injuries. Western powers widely see it as a strategic move to destabilize an emerging regional alliance.
A Shared Agenda of Instability:
When these events are viewed together—the arrest in Jhelum, the false narrative surrounding Pahalgam, unrest in Balochistan, and the sabotage in Iran—a cohesive strategy emerges. The U.S., India, and Israel appear to be working in concert to inflame tensions across South and West Asia. Their ultimate goals? To contain China’s influence, weaken Pakistan, and shift the regional balance of power.
Pakistan’s Open Challenge to the World:
Pakistan’s military has issued a bold challenge: any independent international investigative body—the United Nations, Human Rights Watch, or otherwise—is invited to examine the evidence. According to General Chaudhry, the materials in possession are irrefutable. The question is whether the global community will rise to this challenge or continue to look away under the weight of political expediency and vested interests.
A Region on the Brink:
This is no longer about isolated incidents of terrorism; it’s a sharp turn in the dangerous road of global politics. Pakistan’s evidence paints a stark picture of a multi-nation conspiracy aimed at triggering conflict. It echoes long-standing warnings: the U.S. cannot secure its strategic interests without conflict, and as China rises, America is increasingly cornered into using war as a tool of foreign policy.
In this context, Pakistan may be the immediate target, but the implications stretch far beyond that. The real question confronting the international community is this: Will the world pursue truth and justice or bow to the pressures of power and politics?
Will global silence continue to embolden those pushing the world toward war?
